News

Long suspected of harboring bin Laden, the lawless tribal areas of Pakistan are now under the control of a resurgent Taliban. FRONTLINE investigates a secret front in America’s war on terror.

“… FRONTLINE opens the new season tonight with an excellent piece on this terrifying story. The timing couldn’t be better… Martin Smith, a superb reporter who has done great work in this area as well as Iraq, exposes the extent to which Pakistanis in the ungovernable tribal lands along the border give succor to the Taliban while the Pakistani military looks the other way. His interviews and film footage produce an indelible picture of the situation that no policy story out of Washington can match.”
– Sam Aillis, The Boston Globe

“… an unprecedented view of a terrorist breeding ground that has apparently replaced Taliban-run Afghanistan. ‘Return of the Taliban’ is a frightening look into the medieval madness and violence of the tribal areas — where disloyal elders are beheaded in the public square and thieves are hanged in the streets with money stuffed in their gaping mouths for all to see — should serve as a wakeup call to anyone who thinks America’s enemies are in retreat. … Incorporating vividly unsettling video footage and in-depth interviews with key players in the region, Smith paints a grim picture of a situation that seems to be slipping further from America’s grasp. …”
– Christian Lowe, The Weekly Standard

“… fascinating… compelling viewing — a must-see for anyone with a loved one fighting in Afghanistan, and mandatory viewing for anyone even remotely curious about what’s happening in the literal frontlines of the war on terror. … Veteran Frontline correspondent Martin Smith’s film is truth-telling at its best: straightforward, informative and thoughtful, but not judgmental. …
– Alex Strachan, CanWest News Service

“… a disquieting reminder of what the world is up against when taking on a Muslim holy war.”
– Alessandra Stanley, The New York Times

“… One of the numerous strengths of FRONTLINE through the years has been its ability to provide a historical context in complicated international situations. … So it is with ‘Return of the Taliban,’ as Smith, aided by notable geopolitical experts, explains the complex military and political webs that have been spun in this barren, complex part of the world.”
– Dusty Saunders, Rocky Mountain News

“… The report once again shows why there are no easy answers in this war.”
– Tom Dorsey, Courier-Journal

“… It’s an understatement to call this FRONTLINE an eye-opener.”
– John Doyle, The Globe and Mail

“Frontline” (PBS) unearths the original cut of George Lucas’ least popular Star Wars film, “The Return of the Taliban.”
– Aaron Barnhart, Kansas City Star

“… hard-hitting…”
– Paul Brownfield, Los Angeles Times

“… powerful…”
– Kevin McDonough, United Feature Syndicate

This is a story about Americans growing fiercer in their political views and less tolerant of dissent – an examination of the red/blue or democratic/republican political divide that goes way beneath the recent flurry of news reports on a polarized America. We reveal new information about the changing demographics in the country. And we examine how special interest groups and extreme activists as well as the media and advertising worlds take advantage of the divided electorate to drive us even farther apart. It’s the “perfect storm” of circumstances; one that has made it impossible to compromise or to lead from the center.

They have pledged to raise the banner of Islam over every inch of Palestine. They reject Israel’s right to exist. And now the Palestinians have voted them into power. FRONTLINE/World reporter Kate Seelye travels across the occupied Palestinian territories talking with jailed leaders, party strategists, and militant hard liners to uncover how this Islamist party rose to power and whether it will restrain its militant wing.

Telling the Truth: The Best in Broadcast Journalism, a one-hour documentary hosted by Michel Martin, tracks the winners of this year’s Alfred I. duPont-Columbia University Awards as they continue to work on stories around the world from Sri Lanka to Toronto and San Francisco to Paris. Weaving together candid interviews with award-winning footage, Telling the Truth examines six duPont Award-winning news programs.

Why did federal and local officials fail to protect thousands of Americans from a widely predicted natural disaster? FRONTLINE reporter Martin Smith finds out what happened to FEMA and asks who should be held accountable for the 900 mostly elderly people who lost their lives in New Orleans.

We heard the questions in the days immediately following Hurricane Katrina: Where were the troops, the food, the water? Where were the emergency workers? Where was FEMA?

…in an unsparing yet clear-eyed report, FRONTLINE details what went wrong with the federal response to the storm.

Few of the people interviewed for this report come out smelling good. … It’s a maddening report.
– The Houston Chronicle

“The Storm” does an excellent job exploring what went wrong with the government’s response to Hurricane Katrina in New Orleans.
– Pittsburg Post-Gazette

Leave it to “Frontline” to provide a gripping documentary with fresh facts and analysis, raising important questions we all need to ponder for some time to come.
– Chicago Tribune

Frontline makes Michael Brown squirm, and rarely does television provide more riveting rubber-necking.
– Orlando Sentinel

So who was ultimately responsible for the government’s inept reaction to Hurricane Katrina? “Frontline” offers a dispassionate, methodical but ultimately thoroughly damning account of the federal response, providing vital historical context about the dismantling of FEMA and an interview with its former head Michael Brown that carries the timely reminder it’s important to know when to shut the hell up. Paired with a “Nova” documentary about the science of the storm, this meatier half of the night won’t ease PBS’ left-leaning image among conservative critics, but it’s still must-see TV.

Correspondent Martin Smith leaves few stones unturned in an hour that opens and closes with disturbing homevideo of the disaster’s toll. While Brown apparently hasn’t learned to quit when he’s behind — becoming testy when Smith asks how he could have “misspoken” three times regarding the feds’ knowledge of the conditions in New Orleans — Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff and President Bush notably declined to be interviewed.

… PBS, of course, finds itself caught in its own kind of storm, indicative of the poisonous environment that made discussion of the Katrina response less about competence, whatever one’s allegiance, than about seeking to gain leverage amid the aforementioned finger-pointing and political fallout.

However, Smith’s authoritative approach conveys a meticulous journalistic throughline that all but the most partisan hacks will be hard-pressed to convincingly parry.

At least, that should be true until the next disaster — complete with that year’s edition of “the blame game” — blows into town.
– Variety

Brown is the juiciest target in the program’s post-Katrina shooting gallery, but not the only one.
– Newark Star Ledger

“Frontline” corners the usual suspect, Michael Brown, the former Federal Emergency Management Agency director, who still defends his galling inaction. The reporter, Martin Smith, conducts an aggressive, on-camera interview, described as Mr. Brown’s first since the storm, and the deposed political appointee says that he does not want to pass the buck and then does just that.
– New York Times

“Frontline” revisits the Hurricane Katrina mess and gives former FEMA chief Michael Brown a chance to dig an even deeper hole for himself.
– Kansas City Star

Footage of the storm, much of which appears to be new to television, is breathtaking. Depiction of failures at every level to respond to the hurricane is equally stunning.
– Philadelphia Enquirer

“The Storm” … puts the federal government’s feet to the fire for failing to better prepare for and respond to Hurricane Katrina. It’s a scathing look back at what happened on the political front…
– Los Angeles Times

Smith takes no prisoners: He asks tough questions, is unsmiling throughout and asks tough follow-ups (“So how do you misspeak three times? I don’t understand”). It’s old-school television journalism at its best, the kind you hardly ever see any more on the increasingly airbrushed newsmagazines on the major U.S. networks. … Frontline’s Katrina post-mortem is tightly focused and tightly wound. It tells a complicated story simply and well. … It’s fascinating viewing, eye-opening and revealing, with not a dull moment in it.
– CanWest News Service (Canada)

Over the last two years America has poured billions of dollars into Iraq. Much of it goes to private contractors. And business is booming. FRONTLINE reporter Martin Smith travels to Iraq to see the private side of the war.

“”Private Warriors” is the closest thing to must-see TV that “Frontline” has uncorked in ages. Veteran correspondent Martin Smith, on his fourth trip to Iraq for the program, has reported, written, and coproduced a devastating look at the rodeo of private contractors working for the US government there that should trouble all of us.

“And let it be noted that in doing their jobs in Iraq, he, coproducer Marcela Gaviria, and crew display uncommon braveness that only hints at what reporters stationed there must marshal every day.

“‘Private Warriors’ injects yet more concern about the prosecution of this war, and of others to come. With the smarts and the moxie of a pro, Smith documents something worse than corruption: chaos.”
– The Boston Globe

“”Private Warriors” is the most extensive report to date by any network, broadcast or cable, about the private companies that are providing everything from bodyguards to catering in Iraq. And that includes, in some cases, bodyguards for caterers.

“If this report doesn’t make you angry, it should at least make you squint, scowl and go, “Huh?” Companies such as KBR and the South Africa-based Erinys already have collected tens of millions of dollars for providing services. Yet in trying to get answers to questions as seemingly innocuous as “How much does it cost to feed a U.S. soldier per day?” Smith encounters dodging and double-speak that bring to mind the Kafka-esque interrogations on the old spy series “The Prisoner.” It doesn’t inspire confidence or trust.”
– Newsday

“Smith goes on the ground, harrowingly, to illuminate the dilemma in his fourth visit to Iraq (“the first time I’ve felt it’s unsafe to travel about freely,” he says). He details an extraordinary crazy-quilt system, so huge and scattershot that nobody seems to know exactly who’s doing what or how much it costs.

“In an hour stuffed with solid reporting, Smith opens viewers’ eyes to terrible shortcomings half a world away, providing perspective and information in a dynamic package unavailable anywhere else. He speaks to military men and civilian analysts. His report is remarkable for its thoroughness and even-handedness.”
– The Philadelphia Inquirer

“Private Warriors, tonight’s Iraq-themed news documentary on PBS’s Frontline, offers a fascinating, white-knuckle view of the occupation resistance in Iraq as seen through the eyes of a handful of the 20,000 private-sector security enforcers who live and work there.

“Unlike national newscasts that claim to tell you everything you need to know about Iraq from the comfort of their Washington bureaus or a studio in Toronto, Frontline shows us the view through the shattered, blood-stained windshields of the SUVs that tear along “Route Irish,” an insanely dangerous 15-kilometre stretch between the Baghdad airport and the so-called Green Zone in the city’s centre. There is some gut-wrenching footage here….”
– The Gazette (Montreal)

“Television loves a good car chase, and the squealing of wheels is a trope of any police procedural that becomes bogged down in some urban badlands. Rarely, however, do you see the car chase put to such good use as in the “Frontline” season-ender, as it drives home a few illuminating points on the otherwise dull topic of outsourcing in the armed services.
“In “Private Warriors,” “Frontline” takes a full hour tonight to look at the street-level mayhem in Baghdad and the life-and-death stakes for private security firms, which the United States military employs as protectors and shuttlers in the war zone. The result is appropriately, engagingly upsetting.”
– New York Times

“There are sequences in Tuesday night’s “Frontline,” about the outsourcing of soldiering work in Iraq, that will stick with viewers for a while.”
– Times-Picayune (New Orleans)

“‘Private Warriors’ offers a window into the chaos and violence in Iraq that doesn’t show up on the nightly or cable news reports.”
– Chattanooga Times Free Press (Tennessee)

“It’s a tough-minded look at the role of private contractors in Iraq. … ‘Frontline’s’ report gets not just both sides, but several sides of this complex story. It has nearly an hour of commercial-free airtime to work with and uses its time better than any news organization in the United States.”
– Kansas City Star

“Tonight’s important new episode of ‘Frontline’, the first to really go deep on the issue of contractors in Iraq…”
– The Hartford Courant

A hundred years ago, the Arabian peninsula was a place of warring tribes. Nomads, sheikhs, emirs. Among them was the family of Al Saud. Today they are the guarantors of world oil and stewards of fundamentalist Wahhabi Islam. Can their power hold in the 21st century? A history of modern Saudi Arabia.

“… a scrupulous, informative chronicle of the United States-Saudi Arabian alliance. It’s also romantic, because — it’s irrefutable — the Saudis are romantic. …

“Any invocation of romance in this context may suggest an Orientalist aesthetic, but one of the tacit lessons of this exceptional film by the talented and tireless Martin Smith is that that aesthetic — the one inherited from Lawrence of Arabia days, now updated with images of oil-sponsored opulence and ascetic jihadis — profoundly informs the relationship between the United States and Saudi Arabia. …”
– New York Times

“PBS’ news magazine ‘Frontline’ must have a crystal ball in its office. How else to explain the program’s knack for airing exhaustive documentaries on much-covered topics, mere days after the subject has become urgent again?

“The latest triumph of timing is ‘House of Saud,’ a sharply critical documentary about Saudi Arabia — an oil-rich monarchy that produced 15 of the 19 hijackers, and that inundates its schoolchildren with anti-American and anti-Jewish rhetoric, but is still considered a valued ally. In the foreign policy section of his State of the Union address, President Bush took baby steps toward modifying this opinion, but ‘Frontline’ argues for wholesale revision. …

“While ‘Frontline’ catalogs Saudi Arabia’s troubles with a fairly cold eye, the program ends on a mildly hopeful note…”
– Newark Star-Ledger

“… Leave it to ‘Frontline’ to present a cogent and engrossing history of U.S. dealings with Saudi Arabia for the past 60 years. …”
– The Hartford Courant

“… doesn’t flinch from either the details or the implications…”
– New York Daily News

“Excellent documentary…”
– Houston Chronicle

Nick Hughes visits the chaotic streets of Baghdad for FRONTLINE/World to find out how journalists survive in a war in which they have become targets. He travels with men and women whose quest for the story not only requires body armor as a tool of the trade, but also can lead to sudden death.

In 2004, America faced its first wartime election since Vietnam. Like Vietnam, the war in Iraq has exposed deep divisions in how Americans see this country and its place in the world and defines the differences between the candidates. In The Choice, FRONTLINE takes a hard look at the character, experience, and worldviews of incumbent George W. Bush and challenger John F. Kerry.

“…The Choice” … is far more filmic and nuanced than some of the clip-jobs you may have seen on cable news networks. Much of the archival footage is revelatory….

…We’ll soon have a verdict. Follow the evidence in ‘The Choice 2004’ for an uncommonly rich understanding of these two disparate politicians.”
– Dallas Morning News

“…It is not until well into the two-hour film that ‘The Choice 2004′ presents less familiar, and more rewarding material. It takes well-known episodes in each candidate’s career, moments that network and cable news shows have shrunk down to 10-second sound bites, and blown them back into context.

…’Frontline’ is not saucy or hip, but it does a comprehensive, compelling job of tracing just how deeply rooted the differences between the two men really are.”
– New York Times

“…The film … offers a sustained examination of a subject to which the Kerry campaign has devoted conspicuously little attention, namely the candidate’s Senate history – particularly his opposition to any American military action. … Still, it very soon becomes clear this film offers George Bush’s handlers significantly more occasions for wincing – or would, if most of those occasions didn’t concern already well-known and chewed-over matters….

…An absorbing, adroitly written film (Nicholas Lemann, reporter) whose last line, at least – ‘Soon it will all be over’- should lift hearts on all sides in this memorably bitter election season.”
– Wall Street Journal

“…Another superb and vital edition of television’s finest news documentary series.”
– Detroit Free Press

“… a no-frills, evenhanded analysis of both men — their wartime records, their professional successes and failures, and their personal frailties. It aims to give viewers more of what they need to know to make an informed decision on Nov. 2, but does that without propaganda, half-truths and half-cocked conspiracy theories. ‘The Choice 2004’ deftly conveys that a clear choice is exactly what we have on Election Day. This smart documentary might make that selection a little bit easier.”
– Salt Lake Tribune

“The quadrennial PBS special, ‘The Choice,’ is a highlight of the election cycle. This year’s installment … is no exception. … Dispiriting, enlightening, and revealing. …”
– Denver Post

“…Even when the insights are not fresh, the impartial perspective is, and that’s what makes this concurrent biography a must-see for anyone old enough to vote — or care.”
– New York Daily News

“A welcome relief from network news’ largely useless point-counterpoint reports. … Many of us have already made up our minds by now, which makes the special most useful to those hotly pursued undecided voters. If you consider yourself among that number, this is required viewing. Then again, if you’re among the throngs engaged to a candidate without being wholeheartedly committed, ‘The Choice’ may be exactly what you need to solidify your decision.”
– Seattle Post-Intelligencer

“… fascinating television from at least two perspectives. …The two hours … provide, by far, the most complete study of the two candidates. …”
– Rocky Mountain News

FRONTLINE correspondent Martin Smith travels through a fractured land to reveal just what it will take to stabilize the volatile nation and accelerate the transfer of power to Iraqis.

“…whether award-winning documentarian and producer Martin Smith intended it or not, “Beyond Baghdad” is a refreshingly fair portrayal of the complications coalition forces in Iraq face and shows the intricate tribal and ethnic fractures that run throughout the Middle East.

“…it’s a far cry from the stinging rebuke of the occupiers’ policy many might expect. ….Smith does a good job explaining the cultural landscape and its embedded squabbles — reasonable and irrational.”
– Weekly Standard

“…correspondent Martin Smith’s enlightening and, ultimately depressing exploration of American interactions outside the Iraqi capital…”

“The good humor and good intentions of the U.S. military men and women interviewed here are impressive, but there’s also a sense of fatalism to their remarks: We’re doing what we can, but who knows?”
– Chicago Tribune

“What [Martin Smith] uncovers here is nothing that hasn’t been written about extensively in long, detailed newspaper stories. But seeing the volatile nature of all the disparate people and hearing their tales of tribal revenge and jockeying for position in a post-U.S. Iraq, you very clearly get the sense of how long it’s going to take to get Iraq stable — if we ever do.” …

“If the Bush administration doesn’t want to hear the words ‘quagmire’ or ‘morass,’ it’s not going to be happy with the overall impression conveyed by ‘Beyond Baghdad,’ which is this: What the hell have we got ourselves into?”
– San Francisco Chronicle